Duane Michals

Photography is essentially an act of recognition by street photographers, not an act of invention. Photographers might respond to an old man__ face, or an Arbus freak, or the way light hits a building__nd then they move on. Whereas in all the other art forms, take William Blake, everything that came to that paper never existed before. It__ the idea of alchemy, of making something from nothing.

I think photographers are too polite. There is not enough anger in photography it's pretty much trivialized.

I believe in the imagination. What I cannot see is infinitely more important than what I can see.

Trust that little voice in your head that says 'Wouldn't it be interesting if...' And then do it.

Even in the deepest love relationship - when lovers say 'I love you' to each other - we don't really know what we're saying, because language isn't equal to the complexity of human emotions.

Photographers tend not to photograph what they can__ see, which is the very reason one should try to attempt it. Otherwise we__e going to go on forever just photographing more faces and more rooms and more places. Photography has to transcend description. It has to go beyond description to bring insight into the subject, or reveal the subject, not as it looks, but how does it feel?

A photograph of a woman crying tells me nothing about grief. Or a photograph of a woman ecstatic tells me nothing about ecstasy. What is the nature of these emotions? The problem with photography is that it only deals with appearances.