argument-from-design

However statistically improbable the entity you seek to explain by invoking a designer, the designer himself has got to be at least as improbable. God is the Ultimate Boeing 747.

When you come to look into this argument from design, it is a most astonishing thing that people can believe that this world, with all the things that are in it, with all its defects, should be the best that omnipotence and omniscience have been able to produce in millions of years. I really cannot believe it. Do you think that, if you were granted omnipotence and omniscience and millions of years in which to perfect your world, you could produce nothing better than the Ku Klux Klan or the Fascists? Moreover, if you accept the ordinary laws of science, you have to suppose that human life and life in general on this planet will die out in due course: it is a stage in the decay of the solar system; at a certain stage of decay you get the sort of conditions of temperature and so forth which are suitable to protoplasm, and there is life for a short time in the life of the whole solar system. You see in the moon the sort of thing to which the earth is tending -- something dead, cold, and lifeless.

Actually, the __eap of faith___o give it the memorable name that Soren Kierkegaard bestowed upon it__s an imposture. As he himself pointed out, it is not a __eap_ that can be made once and for all. It is a leap that has to go on and on being performed, in spite of mounting evidence to the contrary. This effort is actually too much for the human mind, and leads to delusions and manias. Religion understands perfectly well that the __eap_ is subject to sharply diminishing returns, which is why it often doesn__ in fact rely on __aith_ at all but instead corrupts faith and insults reason by offering evidence and pointing to confected __roofs._ This evidence and these proofs include arguments from design, revelations, punishments, and miracles. Now that religion__ monopoly has been broken, it is within the compass of any human being to see these evidences and proofs as the feeble-minded inventions that they are.