The word 'proof' should strictly only be used when we are dealing with deductive inferences.... Popper claimed that scientists only need to use deductive inferences.... So if a scientist is only interested in demonstrating that a given theory is false, she may be able to accomplish her goal without the use of inductive inferences.... When a scientist collects experimental data, her aim might be to show that a particular theory...is false. She will have to resort to inductive reasoning.... So Popper's attempt to show that science can get by without induction does not succeed.
Topic
deductive-logic
/deductive-logic-quotes-and-sayings
Topic Summary
About the deductive-logic quote collection
The deductive-logic page groups 3 quotes under one canonical topic hub so readers and answer engines can cite a stable source instead of fragmented search results.
Topic Feed
Quotes filed under deductive-logic
Theologians, and religionists in general, start with a fantasy premise and then proceed to apply rigorous formal logic to tease out its implications. Stark himself points out that __heology consists of formal reasoning about God._ This is admirably exact. Theologians, beginning with a wished-for creation of their own minds, analyze that creation__ characteristics by rigorous application of the principles of formal__hat is, deductive__ogic.
Mathematics is not a deductive science - that's a cliche. When you try to prove a theorem, you don't just list the hypotheses, and then start to reason. What you do is trial and error, experimentation, guesswork.