social-sciences

Life's lessons are designed that we would rise from 'The Fall' (or our failures) and be restored to our Divine nature.

The only debatable issue, it seems to me, is whether it is more ridiculous to turn to experts in social theory for general well-confirmed propositions, or to the specialists in the great religions and philosophical systems for insights into fundamental human values.

The love of money is the root of all evil, therefore selfishness must be the seed.

A nation with a thousand awakened citizens and a corrupt leader, is much more alive than a nation with an awakened leader and a thousand corrupt citizens.

Women have been brought up with the false sense that they have all the options in the world. We don__ understand that the culture really isn__ offering us all of these options _ there still are very strong pressures to conform. We have to step outside the culture to be able to make choices that will really give us what we want. But we lack the psychic mechanisms to do this, to really choose.

Postmodernity means the exhilarating freedom to pursue anything, yet mind-boggling uncertainty as to what is worth pursuing and in the name of what one should pursue it.

The appeal by twentieth-century pluralists to scienti_ method was also ideologically__nd even messianically__riven. It ignored scienti_ data that interfered with environmentalist assumptions and misrepresented socialist faith as __cienti_ planning.

That eating should be foremost about bodily health is a relatively new and, I think, destructive idea-destructive not just the pleasure of eating, which would be bad enough, but paradoxically of our health as well. Indeed, no people on earth worry more about the health consequences of their food choices than we Americans-and no people suffer from as many diet-related problems. We are becoming a nation of orthorexics: people with an unhealthy obsession with healthy eating.