abhorrence

Whatever work you do in this world; the work itself has no value. If there is attachment-abhorrence behind that work, then only you are responsible for the next life. You are not responsible if attachment-abhorrence don__ occur.

Equanimity means that one does not do abhorrence at the time of abhorrence (generating incidents) and one does not do attachment at the time of attachment (generating incidents).

It is called equanimity when one has no attachment with the good (the auspicious) and no abhorrence for the bad (the inauspicious). The one without duality is in equanimity-state. In worldly interactions, people identify tolerance as equanimity!

When you love someone, you end up caring about each and every person they love. When you hate someone, you end up caring about every single person who hates them.

To be naive is to be unaware of how stupid and cruel other people are; but, by some definitions, ignorance is nearly the opposite of naivety in being a kind of cynicism, in being unaware of their intelligence and humanity. It seems to be a normal although unfortunate case that the great many of us consciously abhor ignorance in others yet subconsciously practice it ourselves: as naivety is apparent and well-known to inflict its damage upon oneself; whereas the alternative and the easier, ignorance, its damage upon others.

Abhorrence is the cause for conflicts. God has said, __o no abhorrence. If you don__ like it, ignore it_.

Causes for attachment are created at the very time abhorrence occurs. Familiarity (acquaintance) up to a certain point will result in attachment and if it reaches __idge point_ & goes past further, it will result in abhorrence.

It is the nature of the circumstances to disperse. If there is attachment with the circumstance, there will be abhorrence when they get dispersed.

Once an opinion is formed, there will be attachment-abhorrence. A person without opinion is also without attachment-abhorrence.

Prakruti [the relative self, innate nature] has opinions and may store them but we should stay in an opinion-free state. __e_ are separate and the relative self is separate from us. __e_ should play our part as a separate entity. We shouldn__ get involved with those problems.

If you want liberation [moksha], you will have to be rid of the duality of __ight-and-wrong_. If you want to attain an auspicious (good) state, then have abhorrence for the __rong_, and attachment for the __ight_. There is no attachment or abhorrence in the pure state [shuddha].

Keep on doing whatever it is that you have been doing; but, do no attachment-abhorrence. If __ou_ stay in __our [Pure Soul] state_; attachment-abhorrence will not occur.

Attachment-abhorrence is an __ffect_ and ignorance (of the self) is the __ause_!

Abhorrence towards bitter circumstances and attachment towards sweet ones is the nature of agnan (ignorance of the self). Bitter and sweet will not exist if agnan (ignorance of the self) leaves.

Awareness (of the Self) prevails in matters where one becomes attachment-free (vitrag), and where one has attachment-abhorrence, there his awareness will not prevail.

Attachment-abhorrence is the foundation for the worldly life and the foundation for __nowledge_ is a state free of all attachments (vitragta).