economists

Funny how in a material world full of pundits and economists obsessed with assets and liabilities -personally, economically and globally - few speak about the greatest of all these_YOU.

...If you look at mainstream economics there are three things you will not find in a mainstream economic model - Banks, Debt, and Money. How anybody can think they can analyze capital while leaving out Banks, Debt, and Money is a bit to me like an ornithologist trying to work out how a bird flies whilst ignoring that the bird has wings...

The economists have us well along the way of the greatest mass extinction event in human history.

The curious mind embraces science; the gifted and sensitive, the arts; the practical, business; the leftover becomes an economist

Economists often like startling theorems, results which seem to run counter to conventional wisdom.

If all the economists were laid end to end, they'd never reach a conclusion.

But the age of chivalry is gone. That of sophisters, economists, and calculators has succeeded; and the glory of Europe is extinguished forever.

...some student asked if he [Larry Summers] didn__ have essentially the same relationship with Bob Rubin. Wasn__ Summer__ opposition to capital controls just a sop to Wall Street banks, which wanted to recoup their risky investments regardless of how doing so affected the country in which they had invested? __ummers just lost it,_ said one audience member, a business school student. __e looked at the person and said, __ou don__ know what you__e talking about and how dare you ask this question of the president of Harvard?

Invitation is not only a step in bringing people together, it is also a fundamental way of being in a community. It manifests the willingness to live in a collaborative way. This means that a future can be created without having to force or sell it or barter for it. When we believe that barter or subtle coercion is necessary, we are operating out of a context of scarcity and self-interest, the core currencies of the economist.

They (economists) must set aside their contempt for other disciplines and their absurd claim to greater scientific legitimacy, despite the fact that they know almost nothing about anything.

In my experience, economists rarely believe passionately in, or care passionately for, the free market. They are generally more concerned to reveal the market's imperfections, to further their own professional importance.

The science of public happiness was how Keynes saw his work as an economist.

Experiment and reason, tempered by intuition, were to him preferable to solid plodding in the well-trodden paths of experience.

He never sat an examination in economics: his knowledge came from pondering problems and discussing them as much as from book-learning.

An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he predicted yesterday didn't happen today.

The world is better served by syncretic economists and policymakers who can hold multiple ideas in their heads than by __ne-handed_ economists who promote one big idea regardless of context.